20 July 2013 SAT
… “Sgt. Sean Murphy, who said Rolling Stone’s portrait of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (Boston bombing killer) glamorize ‘the face of terror’, releasing his own images showing him bloody and dishevelled, with a sniper’s riffle laser sight trained on him.”
The news magazine Rolling Stone needs dramatical shots on its cover for the issue to sell in larger volume, purely a commercial act.
While the police photographer Sgt. MURPHY speaks from his heart … and he has reason to feel angry.
In this context, how would one judges on its morality? And if the Rolling Stone cover ethical?