Sharing of common sense and wisdom…

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

新加坡的就业/失业状况与可能发生的社会(心理)状态趋势


以下为当地新闻与相关网上评论摘录。

By:  一叶知秋

以上的新闻报道的可以总结如下: 

1. 即使是高级经理(如金融业,投资等专业)也无法幸免!

2. 许多专业人士,经理,工程,技师等都首当其冲,失业后有超过50% 无法再重回职场。那些能重新找到工作的”幸运儿”也都无法重回他们的行内专业,只能作出牺牲,少拿了一大半的薪金,在新的行业重新起步。这些人为数不少是大学资格,年约在四十岁以上。

3. 各企业对这些”职场下放男/女”都不感性趣,因为这些人的工作经验都与新行业不符合。完全没有竞争力。尤其是那些专业人士被裁之后去加入短期工(如Uber 驾驶之类),就更加无法被专业界重新认同了。

* 以下是网上一则对比美国与某国的人生心理状态的差异的情境 Scenarios。

** 以下为另一则当地新闻报道与网上相关评论。

现在最重要的是,重振新加坡中小企业竞争力(即争取更大市场)的决心与如何在产业转型过程中大量”降低”运作成本与加强融资规模?而面对风险则巳经是新常态。

新加坡中小企业所无法绕过的进程!


By:  路边观察

Mar 2, 2017 

以下为网络评论摘录。

另一视角:  

但新加坡的中小企业界是否看到了全面的挑战与转机?它们正面对了短期但持续性的巨大困扰,即不断加大的营运成本,缺乏资本与融资渠道,加上中小产业界普遍缺乏足够的领导/管理人才。

所以产业界与其政府之间变成了”我等你,你等我” 的 Non-positive (不积极)局面。这一个局面若不打开而走向真正共识,接下来恐怕要花在”对话”的时间会多过”协手奋发”的时间。

新加坡经济前景的不确定性 和 Stakeholders 之间的不同期望


By:  路边观察

以下为当地新闻与网络评论摘录。

特朗普政府施政宣言的三大主线


以下摘录自网络新闻。

新加坡未来经济与产业转型的一则寓言


By:  旁观者

Feb 23, 2017 

以下为网上评论摘录。

有感而发: 

欧盟的一大部分成员国走到今天这一步,实与”集体决心”(政治,精英集团,社会共识)有密切的关系。而欧盟的最终解体与重塑也是必然的历史进程。

Singapore 2017 Fiscal Budget ~ A Balanced Plan For The Time Being 


By:  Simple Minded 

Feb 20, 2017 

Key observation:  The Great, Good & Not So Good

1. Global Innovation Alliance (GIA) 环球创新联盟。 But will this concept really work?  Nobody would share their key development ideas and new discoveries with others, this is the fact. Ask yourself frankly, when did Microsoft, Apple, Tasla, Facebook, Google, and many other innovation undertakings share their new discoveries, methods/skills and insights with outsiders in the process?  A good idea (ie. GIA) but also a flaw concept from the start. Historically all great stuff (especially with great economic/commercial benefits type of innovations) come from COMPETITION. Internal alliances (mixed sectors) are more viable than cross-country/society alliances in innovation; the environment and intense competition make it very different from those international laboratory works or International Space Station (ISS) exploration. 

And, innovation outcome is NOT just simply based on a set of (new) skills that can be transferred to achieve it. (Otherwise, the world would be full of Steve Jobs, Bill Gates etc. etc.) 

2. SME transformation and upscale.  Have to push  but the budget plan did not mention about the most important factor for them (SMEs) ~ where’s the targeted market expansion? The SMEs continue to operate within a small domestic market plus the neighboring countries with limitations. Very very few could really expand overseas in a big way. The question: How to make the cake larger?

3. Investment on education and industrial skill training.  A must do task but it is a huge challenge becos the local job market (60% coming from the SMEs) is no longer able to continue expand in area of ‘aspiring job positions’   for younger graduates and also  professional upgrades; and costs will remain a major concern for SMEs due to inability to expand into new or larger overseas markets. It is an inward loop.

4. Digital society, economy & opportunities.  Very good as this is the trend but, it is more of a long term vision than an economic solution for now. It also highly depends on the pace of neighboring economies to be of motivation for SMEs to strive to link up with and expand into larger markets. 

5. Inclusive society. This is very good. Lots of subsidies for families and social support schemes.

6. Finally and probably most important for this few years, is to bring forward many (govt) infrastructure developments  for (saving) the construction and goods & services/supply industries.  Otherwise, more SMEs may fail and resulting in more retrenchments. 

Overall, the 2017 Fiscal Budget is a balanced plan for all for the time being, though many from the industries might not be overly excited yet. Things will get clearer towards end of the year and probably follow-up economic policy details may be disclosed. 

谁有精神病?!不是特朗普


以下为网络媒体信息摘录。

针对新加坡’未来经济委员会建议书’ 的一篇精简评论


以下为网上短篇加报章媒体摘录。

刊在海峡时报的正文: 

中小企业为新加坡”未来经济”之本


By: 观察员

Feb 12, 2017 

以下为网上评论文章摘录与新闻报道。

观察员评语:

从未来经济委员会报告书的广泛性建议来看,可以看出两个主要因素的影响,

1. 由于2016年发生多项不可预知的重大事件(特郎普当选,TPP被废,英国脱欧,中国对亚太加强影响),使到新加坡的未来经济发展规划完全失去重心; 因此只能提出很广泛性的报告书。毫无执行框架可言。

2. 另一个影响报告书取向的是,到现在为止还没有理出一套比较完整或针对性的产业转型/提升/创新蓝图(blueprint)。这项十分重要的议程只能在接下来的两三年内(?)理清。即使有了转型蓝图,还必须得到产业界的全力支持才能产生动力。

总结,根据以上两个因素,委员会也只能提出广泛性的建议,走—步看一步了( stay open and grasp new opportunities)。

新加坡联合早报社论针对未来经济发展的评论视角


By:  Observer 

Feb 11, 2017 

以下为相关评论的网页摘录。

旁观者总结:  

从战略层面考虑,视角几乎是决定性因素。无论纸上谈兵多么的仔细,若不是从正确的视角去审视问题,必然会有盲点; 最后在执行上将会遭遇极大困境。

Tag Cloud